Lifestyle & Smart living

The global impact of fast fashion and how to combat the wasted wardrobe

The global impact of fast fashion and how to combat the wasted wardrobe

In the Instagram age, image and immediacy are paramount. However, some reporters suggest that the materialistic tendencies of the Millennial movement may be supporting, whether unconsciously or not, unsustainable and unethical practices. These concerns are particularly evident in what’s known as “fast fashion” a term used to describe clothing designs that quickly move from the catwalk to the high street to capture the current mood, but which are discarded just as swiftly. According to environmental advocates, these short-lived, disposable garments have a significant negative impact on the environment, economy, and society.

Reportedly, the fashion industry is the second biggest polluter, consuming vast amounts of water, generating monumental CO2 emissions, and producing a significant amount of waste. Projections suggest that if current practices continue, there will be a 60% increase in water waste by 2030, rising to an alarming 148k tonnes. Greenhouse gas emissions are also a concern, with forecasts predicting 38.4 billion tonnes within the next decade. Furthermore, there is a notable human cost associated with fast fashion, with 14 million workers reportedly being paid only 120% of the minimum wage, which is insufficient for a decent quality of life. This wage discrepancy is not limited to companies outsourcing to sweatshops in poorer countries— even within the UK, those working in high-production areas reportedly earn less than those in other sectors.

In response, some UN nations are attempting to mitigate the impact of fast fashion through sustainable initiatives. For instance, France plans to ban stores from disposing of unsold garments, and Denmark has banned single-use plastics at Copenhagen Fashion Week. Major brands are also making efforts to become more sustainable, with Nike using recycled polyester in their clothing range and recycling 99% of all recyclable water used during the dyeing process.

The study suggests that individuals can also make a difference. It may seem straightforward, but by purchasing fewer new clothes, everyone can help reduce overproduction.

The editorial unit

More in Lifestyle & Smart living

What makes a whisky worth the pour 

The editorial unit

How regular brake replacement can save money in the long run

The editorial unit

Laminate veneers: A modern smile makeover made affordable and accessible

The editorial unit

Five signs it may be time to own property in Spain (even before retirement)

The editorial unit

The hidden factors that impact the car insurance premiums

The editorial unit

Leather jacket styles for women: A seasonal fashion guide

The editorial unit

Hostingcore: The home trend that’s all good times & great company

The editorial unit

The rise of quiet travel: Why more Brits are choosing slow and serene staycations

The editorial unit
Caroline Gardner

Inject some colour into your home with Caroline Gardner’s gorgeous new spring collection

Alexandra Davis